Jonathan Graves teaches music lessons to all ages in New York, NY
that are personalized, visual and fun, using technology
in new ways to bring joy into every step of the learning process.
Jonathan Graves is a producer, vocalist and multi-instrumentalist raised in Pittsburgh, PA and currently living in Brooklyn, NY.
He writes and performs music with the electronic/indie-rock group Corbu, and will be releasing his second EP on the New York/Paris-based record label Scissor & Thread in the winter of 2012. Jonathan was the first music teacher at The Lang School, a visual, tech-oriented primary school for gifted children with special needs, only the second of its kind in the United States. Along with developing the music curriculum at Lang from its inception in 2010 until the summer of 2012, he has spent his days with the innovative local teaching collective Brooklyn Music Lessons since its formation in 2008.
Jonathan has been performing since age 10, when he toured the world as a soloist with the Pittsburgh Boychoir, sang with the Samara (Russia) Symphony Orchestra, the Pittsburgh Opera, and performed the national anthem for the Pittsburgh Penguins. He grew up playing piano, guitar, drums, violin, and french horn, and studied voice with Grammy-winning tenor Timothy Nobel at Indiana University's Jacobs School of Music.
I’ve been really into the Australian psych-rock band Tame Impala lately. Kevin Parker’s songwriting keeps getting better, and seeing them live last week made me notice how crazy and effective his song structures are becoming.
One of my favorite tracks on the new album is “Music to Walk Home By.” Like a lot of the record, it bounces around between sections almost unpredictably, but the transitions and arrangements make it feel natural and effortless. It’s almost 5 minutes long, but feels short because it moves around so much.
I put the song into Live to see how it works. Here’s what I got (click to enlarge):
EDIT: I realized how abstract this whole thing is without a video. Here you go:
Timeline
Noise Intro / 8 bars / Kevin doing some pedal feedback stuff
A (vocal) / 8 bars / Jumps right into the “verse”
A (instrumental) / 8 bars / synth solo
B (vocal) / 8 bars / keeps the feel of section A but with different chords
A (vocal) / 8 bars / back into the verse
A->C transition / 4 bars / Keeps A going, then stops with an FX build into the new section
C (vocal) / 16 bars / a whole new melody and feel, with a start-stop rhythm
D (B alternate) (vocal) / 8 bars / returns to the chords of B, but with the start-stop feel of C
D (B alt) (instrumental) / 8 bars / synth solo with some amazing vocal harmony stabs
D (B alt) (instrumental 2) / 8 bars / a different synth melody, mostly stays the same but chords start morphing towards…
E (instr) / 4 bars / introduces a new chord progression
E (vocal) / 8 bars / vocals over the new progression
C (intro) / 4 bars / whole band breaks down to a quiet version of C
C (vocal) / 12 bars / bursts back into C, with Kevin singing “So anyway…”
C (instrumental) / best guitar melody on the record starts creeping in over the vocals, then finally Kevin stops singing and doubles it. vocals return as the riff keeps going and the song fades out.
Conclusion
You can be pretty ambitious with changing the chord progression again and again, as long as the rhythm ties it all together. I’m pretty sure it’s not recorded to a click track, and feels like a live band playing together in a room… but supposedly he tracks everything himself in his studio. How does he get it sounding so fluid, when he tracks guitar and drums separately? Pretty amazing.
Make weird soundscapes in Tibersynth, by Cory O’Brien.
Needs Chrome, Firefox or Safari to work.
Hit the space bar or click for sound, hit “R” key to randomize and change the soundscape.
For bonus points, you can sample this and get some good percussion or textural sounds from it. My process, using Ableton Live on a Mac:
From Lifehacker - “The more you struggle with new information, the more likely you are to learn it”:
Trying to learn new skills or new information can be really frustrating, but as Time Magazine points out, the more you struggle with taking on new information the more likely you are to retain and recall that information later.
Nobody likes to fail when learning a new task, but it’s an essential part of the learning process that’s often left out when we’re offered up information in a neatly packaged, structured way. While much of the research into the learning process is concentrated on children, it’s a lesson adults can learn from as well. As Time notes, employers use the same process as many teachers:
[W]hile the model adopted by many teachers and employers when introducing others to new knowledge—providing lots of structure and guidance early on, until the students or workers show that they can do it on their own—makes intuitive sense, it may not be the best way to promote learning. Rather, it’s better to let the neophytes wrestle with the material on their own for a while, refraining from giving them any assistance at the start.
It’s a healthy reminder that struggling through a difficult problem—whether it’s learning Photoshop, getting used to a new webapp, or picking up a new skill—is a necessary part of the learning process. It also works out in the long run because you’re better able to recall the information you learned.
This is definitely true, though the trick as a teacher is to maintain a certain level of push and pull with a student… letting them sail for awhile to build confidence, then force them into a place where they’ll struggle, knowing they’ve built the confidence that will get them through it.
Svante Stadler at Heart of Noise gets it. His app, FLAIL, automatically detects the BPM and key of the song you’re listening to, then throws you into jam mode using the notes from the song’s scale. Badass. And that’s the best app demo video I’ve seen since iMaschine’s Jamie Lidell bit.
Stadler has a bunch of good stuff going on at his site, including a Flash-based human voice synthesizer. Take a look:
(via a comment on Create Digital Music)
Noteflight is a new-ish online service that lets you create, read and share musical scores. It’s been amazing in the classroom with my kids, and I’m finding it to be a great tool for all ages when it comes to notating melodic ideas.
I don’t have a ton of experience with Finale (the most established software package for this sort of thing), but I’ve played around with Sibelius and found it to have a pretty steep learning curve. Noteflight is simple to use, but powerful enough to score out unlimited parts. A free account gives you ten instruments to use in your compositions, and a moderately-priced paid account (around $8/month or $50/year) bumps you up to 50 instruments, along with direct MIDI input and other features.
When I started teaching music using contemporary songs and electronic tools, it was a challenge to make traditional sheet music feel relevant. I could teach students how to read notation in the abstract, but actually bringing it into the world of MIDI composition and samplers felt forced. Noteflight is great because it lets my students compose melodies and harmonies with the notation, and then export those parts (via MIDI) back into Garageband or Ableton Live for the usual synth-and-beats treatment. It feels modern, with a clean, easy-to-understand interface and YouTube-like sharing and embedding functionality.
As an example, here’s a short piece one of my 12 year-old students at The Lang School composed in my class (Tumblr & Noteflight’s embed code don’t seem to get along yet):
“Song by Julien” on Noteflight
More info at:
A nine year-old piano/composition/production student of mine was fascinated by the sinking of the Titanic. He edited this video, scored and designed the sound for it with my guidance in an hour.